SAP Certified - Database Administrator - SAP HANA 認定 C_DBADM_2601 試験問題:

1. CHALLENGE 3 - Cloud Migration Readiness Separation
The project team wants to approve cloud migration planning using three facts: the SAP HANA Cloud database is provisioned, limited activation data is loaded, and on-premises UAT reports run successfully. Which validation step is still required?

A) Approve migration planning because the three facts cover the full readiness chain.
B) Treat the limited dataset as proof that cloud monitoring and recovery evidence are complete.
C) Stop on-premises UAT validation because the future reporting direction is cloud-based.
D) Confirm cloud administration readiness evidence for the limited activation dataset scope.

2. A media analytics provider is documenting the administration model for SAP HANA across an on-premises system and an SAP HANA Cloud environment. During validation, an administrator records that monitoring, backup review, and database explorer checks are being performed from different tools without a clear statement of which environment each evidence item represents. The cloud instance is available, and the on-premises system is also active for the current reporting workload.
The constraint is that the administration handover must distinguish environment-specific evidence before operational ownership changes. The team must avoid accepting mixed proof that combines cloud availability with on-premises operational checks.
Which action best supports a reliable handover?

A) Delay all validation until the on-premises workload is migrated so only one environment remains active.
B) Create a validation record that maps each tool output to the specific SAP HANA environment before accepting the handover.
C) Combine all successful checks into one operations summary because both environments belong to the SAP HANA landscape.
D) Use the cloud availability status as the primary handover evidence because the modernization target is available.

3. CHALLENGE 2 - Dispatch Simulation Monitoring Baseline
The monitoring dashboard shows acceptable business-hour availability, but carrier exception behavior varies overnight. The thresholds may still reflect the pre-cutover reporting profile. Which action best supports a reliable cutover conclusion?

A) Increase all thresholds so the final readiness review avoids unnecessary performance warnings.
B) Tune the overnight workload first and update monitoring evidence after the release decision.
C) Confirm threshold relevance for the overnight dispatch workload before interpreting the dashboard trend.
D) Treat business-hour availability as sufficient because the database remained reachable.

4. A regional cinema chain uses SAP HANA for ticketing analytics. The administrator reviews a recovery rehearsal after a scheduled backup change. The restore completes in the validation environment, but the recovered database timestamp is earlier than the recovery point listed in the operations policy. SAP HANA cockpit shows that backups are running, and the backup catalog includes several successful entries. A support coordinator suggests accepting the rehearsal because the database opened and reports can be queried.
The constraint is that the administrator must prove recovery to the required policy point. The team must not accept a technically usable recovered database if the selected backup sequence does not meet the expected recovery target.
Which action best resolves the recovery evidence gap?

A) Create a new data backup and replace the earlier recovery point with the new backup completion time.
B) Identify the backup sequence that reaches the required policy point, rerun the restore, and validate the recovered timestamp.
C) Increase backup frequency so future recovery rehearsals have more available backup entries.
D) Accept the rehearsal because the recovered database opened successfully and reports can be queried.

5. A regional specialty foods company is rehearsing a phased move from SAP HANA on-premises to SAP HANA Cloud. The migration transfer completes, and database explorer can query the cloud target. During validation, the administrator finds that the cloud-side backup review was performed before the imported content was available, while monitoring review was performed after import. The project lead wants approval because both checks appear in the workbook.
The constraint is that the migration wave must prove target administration readiness after the migrated state exists. The team needs repeatable validation evidence for later waves, not a checklist that mixes pre-import and post-import states.
What should the administrator recommend?

A) Repeat only the data transfer because the timing mismatch indicates that the imported content may not have reached the cloud target.
B) Approve the rehearsal because both backup review and monitoring review are present in the validation workbook.
C) Repeat the target-side backup review after import, confirm monitoring evidence for the same migrated state, and approve only if both pass.
D) Defer backup review until after production cutover because monitoring was already validated after import.

質問と回答：