SAP Certified - Database Administrator - SAP HANA 認定 C_DBADM 試験問題:

1. A regional utilities billing provider uses SAP HANA for meter usage analytics in an on-premises administration environment. After a planned stop and start sequence, SAP HANA cockpit shows the database as available. During post-start validation, the administrator finds that a scheduled health-check job did not run because its execution window still references the pre-maintenance calendar setting. Manual checks succeed, and the support team wants to close the activity because user dashboards are accessible.
The constraint is that the administrator must confirm routine post-start administration is restored before closure. The validation must prove scheduled execution readiness, not only manual access or database availability.
Which action best resolves the post-start validation gap?

A) orrect the scheduled job execution window, run or validate the next planned health-check execution, and record the result.
B) eplace the scheduled health check with an on-demand manual check for the next reporting cycle.
C) estart the database again so the scheduled health-check job can inherit the current maintenance calendar automatically.
D) lose the activity because SAP HANA cockpit availability and successful manual checks prove operational readiness.

2. <strong>CHALLENGE 4 &#x2014; Release Recoverability Evidence Gate</strong> The business sponsor asks whether the release decision can proceed because the systems are available and backups completed. The administration lead wants startup behavior after recovery documented first. Which response best fits the scenario?

A) roceed because availability and backup completion together are enough for release evidence.
B) omplete recovery validation and startup behavior documentation before final sign-off.
C) emove recovery evidence from the release package because UAT is not daily production.
D) roceed now and validate startup behavior during the later cloud migration phase.

3. <strong>CHALLENGE 3 &#x2014; Quota and Source Coordination for Multi-Vendor Materials</strong> During isolated testing, a seasoning blend behaves acceptably with more than one approved supplier. During cross-plant cutover rehearsal, however, purchasing activity begins concentrating around one operationally convenient vendor even though the intended design expects shared supplier usage. What is the best interpretation?

A) he concentration on one vendor proves that the original sourcing design was unnecessarily complex
B) he team should validate whether quota-related sourcing setup and source coordination remain aligned once cross-plant operational demand is introduced
C) he multi-vendor design is working because at least one approved supplier is being used successfully
D) he project should remove multi-vendor materials from the first live week to simplify supplier communication

4. <strong>CHALLENGE 2 &#x2014; Simulation Monitoring Baseline Control</strong> The reporting team asks to apply memory-related tuning before the next baggage-volume simulation because response times varied during the first SIT cycle. The current monitoring baseline has not been fully captured. What should the database owner do first?

A) pply tuning immediately because faster simulation response time supports rollout confidence.
B) ove tuning decisions to the SAP HANA Cloud system because future analytics will run there.
C) apture current monitoring behavior and validate threshold relevance before approving tuning.
D) isable simulation monitoring so the next run focuses only on report completion.

5. A subscription services provider operates SAP HANA in a mixed environment. After a planned configuration adjustment intended to improve throughput, administrators observe that nightly batch processing finishes on time, but interactive analyst queries now show intermittent delays. Monitoring shows no broad system outage, and memory consumption remains stable. CPU peaks occur only during specific interactive workload windows.
The platform owner wants a correction that preserves the batch improvement while avoiding a broad reversal of the recent tuning changes. The team must decide based on actual workload behavior rather than a general assumption that the entire configuration set should be rolled back.
What is the best next step?

A) ncrease system memory allocation first because stable memory use indicates the system is close to its capacity boundary.
B) ompare the changed configuration against the affected workload pattern and adjust only the setting that is degrading interactive execution behavior.
C) everse all recent configuration changes immediately because any slowdown after tuning proves the full change set was invalid.
D) ove the interactive workload to the cloud database without further analysis because the current landscape already supports mixed deployment.

質問と回答：