SAP Certified - SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition, Sourcing and Procurement 認定 C_TS452 試験問題:

1. A consumer durables company is validating centrally governed sourcing agreements in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition for a region that is transitioning from locally negotiated purchasing into a shared sourcing model. Category managers can create and release the agreements, and buyers can see the suppliers in the purchasing apps. However, when purchase orders are created for one product family, the system proposes the supplier but does not apply the intended pricing and sourcing conditions from the released agreement. For another product family under the same sourcing program, the agreement is applied correctly.
The sourcing director wants the issue corrected without allowing regional buyers to override pricing manually. The fix must remain within standard clean-core design and support a controlled transition from local sourcing behavior to the shared model.
What is the most appropriate first action?

A) Delay shared sourcing for the affected product family and continue local price negotiation for the current cycle.
B) Verify whether the released agreement is correctly bound to the affected product-family scope and purchasing conditions used during PO creation.
C) Allow regional buyers to enter the correct pricing manually until the shared sourcing model is fully adopted.
D) Rebuild the supplier master because missing agreement pricing usually indicates incomplete supplier-contact data.

2. A hospital-consumables distributor is validating cycle-count recount processing in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition while migrating a regional warehouse from a local stock-control process into the shared inventory template. Inventory documents can be created, initial counts are entered, and recounts can be triggered when variances exceed tolerance. For most medical-supply groups, the recount cycle ends with final difference posting. However, for one controlled implant group in the migrated warehouse, the recount completes but the document remains in a locked follow-on status and cannot move to final posting.
The same implant group works in a previously stabilized warehouse, and other groups in the migrated warehouse finish correctly. The migration lead wants the issue corrected before mock cutover. Manual stock adjustment is not allowed, and the standard warehouse template must remain unchanged in principle for upcoming site migrations.
What is the most appropriate first action?

A) Recreate the recount documents because locked follow-on status usually begins with count-entry timing inconsistencies.
B) Ask warehouse users to complete the implant-group recounts in the stabilized warehouse until all site migrations are finished.
C) Check whether the migrated warehouse has implant-group-specific control or status settings preventing the standard transition from completed recount to final posting.
D) Broaden warehouse authorization so users can force final posting after recount for the blocked implant documents.

3. A business-services company is validating planned-delivery-cost handling in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition for a new procurement category. Requesters can create requisitions in SAP Fiori, approvals finish successfully, and buyers can begin purchase-order creation. For most document types, the purchase order is created with the expected planned-delivery-cost behavior. However, for one service-oriented purchasing category, the buyer can start conversion but the purchase order fails validation because the planned-cost treatment is not carried into the follow-on document consistently.
Another service category in the same company code works correctly. The project lead wants the issue corrected before automated regression starts. Buyers must not use manual free-text workarounds, and the fix must remain standard because the same design will be reused for later category activation.
What should the consultant check first?

A) Ask buyers to create manual purchase orders for the affected category until regression testing is complete.
B) Broaden buyer authorization so the purchase order can bypass the missing planned-cost validation during conversion.
C) Verify whether the affected purchasing category is correctly linked to the required follow-on document settings and planned-delivery-cost determination.
D) Rebuild requisition approval because approved demand should always carry delivery-cost treatment into the purchase order.

4. A paper-packaging manufacturer is validating stock transport procurement in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition after standardizing two plants onto a shared materials-management template. Purchase documents and goods movements are being created successfully for inter-plant replenishment. However, when the team validates the follow-on valuation impact for one receiving plant, the system fails the financial posting check for a specific material grouping, while the same stock transport scenario works in the other plant. The issue appeared after a transport containing plant-dependent materials-management settings.
Logistics users can still complete the movement steps, but the integrated validation remains incomplete. The implementation manager wants the team to correct the root cause before the second plant goes live. Manual finance postings are not allowed, and the template must remain standard and transportable.
Which action should the consultant take first?

A) Review whether the receiving plant’s valuation and account-determination settings are correctly aligned for the affected material grouping.
B) Ask finance to post the receiving-plant valuation adjustments manually until both plants complete the stabilization period.
C) Recreate the stock transport documents because follow-on valuation failures usually originate in document-entry inconsistencies.
D) Expand plant-user authorization so the follow-on financial validation can complete during the next test cycle.

5. <strong>CHALLENGE 3 &#x2014; Approval Routing Stability for Seasonal Opening Orders</strong> A reviewer notes that seasonal opening orders can be executed successfully in two ways: one route follows the common approval structure, and the other uses locally shortened routing. The business asks which route should guide deployment readiness. Which option is most appropriate?

A) Use the shortened route for opening orders tied to food and beverage only
B) Use the common approval structure unless it prevents opening orders from meeting operational timing expectations
C) Use the faster route because any method that keeps opening activity on schedule is acceptable during UAT
D) Keep both routing options available so each property can choose based on opening pressure

質問と回答：