SAP Certified - SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition, Sourcing and Procurement 認定 C_TS452_2601 試験問題:

1. A consumer products company is validating a new purchasing group structure in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition to support regional procurement ownership. Material masters, supplier records, and purchasing info records have been migrated for the pilot region. Requisition creation works, and buyers can open the conversion app in the web UI. However, when one regional buyer group tries to convert requisitions into purchase orders, the documents are blocked because the system cannot complete the organizational determination for the purchasing step.
Another regional buyer group using the same document type can convert successfully. The rollout lead wants a scalable correction that supports the future regional waves. The team must avoid temporary cross-region processing and cannot introduce exceptions that would weaken the target operating model.
Which action is the best first step?

A) Recreate the requisitions with a different document type because purchasing conversion blocks typically originate in requisition formatting.
B) Allow the successful regional buyer group to process all requisitions temporarily so the pilot timeline remains intact.
C) Build a custom routing rule that sends blocked requisitions to a default purchasing region until all rollout waves are complete.
D) Verify whether the affected regional purchasing structure and related master-data assignments are consistently maintained for the tested requisition scope.

2. A global apparel company is onboarding a new purchasing plant in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition after divesting it from a legacy ERP process. Material and supplier master records were loaded, and initial procurement tests can create requisitions and draft purchase orders. However, when buyers attempt to use quota-based supplier allocation for a set of replenishment materials, the system ignores the intended supplier split and consistently proposes only one source. The same allocation logic works correctly for comparable materials in an established plant.
The implementation manager wants the issue corrected before the divested plant begins live operation. The team must not introduce local exceptions or manual allocation because supplier balancing is part of the approved operating model and will be reused for future plants.
What is the best first action?

A) Add a custom rule that forces alternating supplier selection for the affected plant until rollout stabilizes.
B) Recreate the replenishment materials because source-allocation failures usually come from incomplete material descriptions.
C) Verify whether the new plant has the required source-allocation-relevant organizational and master-data assignments for the affected materials.
D) Ask buyers to alternate suppliers manually until the plant completes its first month of operations.

3. A distribution business has completed basic inventory management setup in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition and is running physical inventory tests before cutover. Warehouse users can create inventory documents, but when differences are posted for one storage location, the posting fails with a status mismatch after a recent transport import. In the same plant, another storage location processes successfully. The project team confirms that users have the required operational role and that the inventory document itself was created correctly.
A junior consultant suggests repeating the count process from the beginning, while the cutover manager wants a fix that preserves standard process control and prevents the same issue during production migration.
Which action is most appropriate?

A) Review whether the recent transport introduced a storage-location-specific configuration inconsistency affecting inventory difference posting.
B) Post the differences manually in finance to keep the stock adjustment aligned while the logistics issue is reviewed later.
C) Grant broader inventory authorizations to warehouse users because posting failures usually indicate restricted execution rights.
D) Restart the entire physical inventory cycle for the affected storage location so the failed status is reset before cutover.

4. A beverage-container manufacturer is validating external procurement for reusable handling units in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition after aligning two plants to a shared materials-management template. Buyers can create purchase orders, and warehouse users can post goods receipts without interruption for the affected materials. However, when the team validates the follow-on financial impact for one plant, the posting check fails for reusable-handling-unit materials only. The same procurement scenario works in the other plant using the same process flow.
The issue began after a transport that included plant-dependent posting-control settings. The implementation lead wants the root cause corrected before the second plant moves into production. Manual finance postings are not allowed, and the shared template must remain standard and transportable for the next rollout phase.
Which action should the consultant take first?

A) Broaden plant-user authorization so the blocked financial validation can complete during the next test cycle.
B) Recreate the purchase orders because selective financial validation failures usually begin with buyer-side document-entry inconsistency.
C) Review whether the affected plant’s valuation and account-determination settings are correctly aligned for the reusable-handling-unit material scenario.
D) Ask finance to post the missing plant-specific entries manually until the rollout template is stabilized across both plants.

5. A packaging supplier group is being onboarded to shared-services invoice processing in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition. Purchase orders, goods receipts, and standard invoice entries are posting correctly for most suppliers. However, for one service-material supplier segment, invoices can be entered and referenced correctly, but the system keeps the documents in a blocked settlement-review state instead of moving them forward automatically. The same document pattern for stock materials works correctly in the same company code, and the same service-material supplier segment worked in the earlier template company code before harmonization.
The finance process owner wants a controlled correction before shared-services expansion. Manual postings outside the standard process are not allowed, and the fix must remain transportable and aligned with standard governance.
Which action should the consultant take first?

A) Review whether the company-code-specific invoice and settlement control settings are correctly aligned for the affected service-material supplier segment.
B) Recreate the purchase orders because blocked settlement-review states usually start with buyer-side document-entry inconsistencies.
C) Expand finance authorization so the blocked invoices can complete the follow-on settlement step automatically.
D) Ask the shared-services team to process those service-material invoices manually until the harmonized model is stable.

質問と回答：