SAP Certified - SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition, Sourcing and Procurement 認定 C_TS452_2601 試験問題:

1. <strong>CHALLENGE 2 &#x2014; Workflow Responsibility Stability for Time-Sensitive Orders</strong> During rehearsal, one depot can progress urgent replacement orders fast enough only after local staff narrow the intended workflow and approval pattern. The central sourcing office wants cutover to confirm one common workflow structure before go-live. What should the validation team do next?

A) Let each depot define its own workflow path for urgent operational demand during the first live cycle
B) Recheck whether urgent-order timing remains acceptable under restored common workflow conditions before accepting local deviation
C) Remove urgent-order scenarios from cutover rehearsal and review them after go-live stabilization
D) Keep the locally narrowed workflow because vehicle-return readiness should always outweigh shared control behavior

2. A sourcing and procurement program is running final governed regression in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition after a controlled transport moved approval-related configuration and refreshed validation content into pre-production. Manual requisitioning, purchase-order creation, and invoice verification still work in SAP Fiori. However, one automated approval package now fails at startup because the environment log shows that the required release configuration is active, but the package is still referencing an outdated scope-specific execution binding for one business area.
A comparable package for another business area runs successfully in the same tenant. The release manager wants a targeted correction before sign-off. No broad fallback access may be granted, and no test-only exception is allowed because the production-aligned lifecycle model must remain controlled and audit-ready.
Which action should the consultant take first?

A) Mark the failed package as acceptable because another approval package still works in the same environment.
B) Rebuild the approval rules because startup failures usually indicate incomplete release-process design.
C) Restore the earlier broader regression setup so the failed package can run before the sign-off deadline.
D) Compare the transported business-area scope assignment and the execution binding referenced by the affected approval package in pre-production.

3. A specialty-paper converter is validating invoice verification for unplanned supplier charges in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition after harmonizing procurement controls across two company codes. Standard purchase orders, goods receipts, and regular invoices are posting successfully. For most suppliers, invoices that include unplanned additional charges continue through the expected follow-on processing. However, for one supplier segment in the newly harmonized company code, users can enter the invoice and reference the purchase order, but the system places the document into a blocked review state whenever the additional charge scenario is present.
The same supplier segment worked correctly in the earlier template company code. The finance owner wants the issue corrected before shared-services expansion. Manual postings outside the standard process are not allowed, and the solution must remain standard, transportable, and governance-aligned.
Which action should the consultant take first?

A) Ask the shared-services team to process the affected invoices manually until the harmonized company code is fully stabilized.
B) Recreate the purchase orders because blocked invoice review states usually begin with buyer-side document-entry inconsistencies.
C) Broaden finance authorization so the blocked invoices can bypass the review state during posting.
D) Review whether the company-code-specific invoice-verification and follow-on control settings are correctly aligned for the supplier segment and unplanned-charge scenario.

4. A diagnostic-equipment distributor is validating stock transfer posting in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition while migrating a regional warehouse from a legacy local process into the shared inventory template. Goods receipts and stock inquiries work as expected for most material groups. However, when warehouse users post an internal stock transfer for one serialized accessory group, the system creates the movement document but leaves the transfer in a blocked follow-on state for the target storage section. The same accessory group transfers successfully in an already stabilized warehouse, and other material groups in the migrated warehouse complete the process without issue.
The migration manager wants the issue resolved before mock cutover. Manual stock adjustments are not allowed, and the standard warehouse template must remain usable for additional regional migrations.
What is the most appropriate first action?

A) Check whether the migrated warehouse has storage-section-specific control or status settings preventing completion of the serialized transfer.
B) Ask warehouse users to route the serialized accessories through the stabilized warehouse until the migration is complete.
C) Broaden warehouse authorization so users can force the blocked transfer to the target storage section.
D) Recreate the stock transfer because blocked follow-on status usually begins with movement-entry inconsistency.

5. A field-services company is validating blanket-purchase-order processing in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition for recurring maintenance spend. Requesters can create purchase requisitions in SAP Fiori, approvals finish successfully, and buyers can begin creating the follow-on purchasing documents. For most service categories, the blanket purchase order can be used in downstream call-off processing without issue. However, for one maintenance category, the purchase order is created but downstream release of the expected call-off step fails because the document is missing the required control state.
The same buyers and approval flow work correctly for another maintenance category in the same company code. The rollout lead wants the issue corrected before broader user testing begins. Buyers must not use free-text workaround purchasing, and the fix must remain standard and reusable for later category activation.
What should the consultant check first?

A) Broaden buyer authorization so the missing downstream call-off state can be bypassed during processing.
B) Ask buyers to create free-text orders for the affected maintenance category until user testing is complete.
C) Rebuild requisition approval because approved demand should always carry the required control state into follow-on purchasing.
D) Verify whether the affected maintenance category is correctly linked to the follow-on purchasing controls needed for the expected blanket-order call-off behavior.

質問と回答：